Mar 6, 2010
The Sleaze & Hypocrisy Of The Hull Daily Mail
A couple of days ago I got sent a link from an old colleague in newspapers which horrified me for a couple of reasons…
It was for a Facebook campaign to boycott the Hull Daily Mail, and the more I looked at what they were up to the more disgusted I was, because 1 – I used to work for the HDM and held it in high regard and look back on my time there with great affection, and 2 – because I’m a web designer who knows how hard it is to keep afloat these days.
The Hull Daily Mail is essentially campaigning against a guy called Paul Smith who runs a local community newspaper online called HU17.net and is – without actually making any kind of genuine charge or accusation – simply calling him unfit for this. He has a past in building websites in the ‘adult’ (that’s posh for ‘porn’) industry – though he apparently only owns some hundred or so domains, which seems slightly at odds with the Hull Daily Mail’s shrill accusation that he’s responsible for “thousands” of hardcore porn websites (which would surely make him a lot wealthier and busier). But, as I say, no actual charge of any actual wrongdoing or illegal activity. Just smear and innuendo.
Also they do something very very disturbing and very very distasteful. They mention as a complete non-sequitur that this news website about Beverley publishes pictures of… wait for it… “junior sports fixtures”… Can you see what they did there? Yep – they say he’s a porn monger and then they cannily throw in that phrase. They’re not insinuating anything of course. No, no, no… They’re just saying… “JUNIOR SPORTS FIXTURES”… nudge nudge.
I was genuinely gobsmacked when I read those words. That barely passes as innuendo, and surely can’t have been okayed by a lawyer.
Now it may be that this guy *has* done something wrong – but I for one cannot see any evidence of this and the Hull Daily Mail don’t seem willing to publish anything to that effect. They seem happy to pursue what appears to be a bullying policy of harassment against a competitor.
Oh yes – a competitor – that’s the other side to this story. The Hull Daily Mail doesn’t mention anywhere that it’s doing a smear campaign against someone who’s basically doing the same kind of business as them, and on the same turf. And that’s kind of important.
Comments on the Hull Daily Mail website and also on the Press Gazette website seem to be unanimous in seeing this hateful campaign as nothing more than a shitty, ill-judged and quite despicable vendetta for commercial reasons. Comments on the HDM site have today been suspended and the masses and masses of comments forming a backlash on the previous articles have been removed.
The paper claims – in Press Gazette – that it is acting in “the public interest” – whereas there’s nothing to suggest that it is doing that at all. If they have allegations about Paul Smith and his works or his past then they should make them, and/or speak with the police.
However if what the Hull Daily Mail are saying is that it is in the public interest that somebody who does work for sleazy adult/porno services has no right to be doing online sites (and online sites that contain pictures of “junior sports fixtures” ahem) then fair enough – so long as they close their websites until they cease running advertisements for euphemistic “massage” and “escort” services, which are simply adult and sleazy. The Hull Daily Mail is throwing stones from its own sewer of a glass house.
They seem to have no legal case or direction on this, and certainly they have no moral compass whatsoever, so one hopes that if there is no *legal* here that they will get off their high horse, apologise (in as prominent a size and position as their gutter-press vilifications) and back down.
If not, then I hope this is as massive a PR and commercial disaster for them as it looks like being.
Here is where you can find out more about this whole sad sorry saga… and more here…
Please find out more about this and make up your own mind.
And if you’re as sickened as me then make waves.
You have summed that up nicley. Good to see others find this story as important as I do.
Its not about one man and his site its about the bigger picture.
Lorna
This is a really interesting one and I can see both sides. I think you have totally and utterly missed the point! Let me explain. Yes the Hull Daily Mail have ads in the back for massage parlours etc – however they are a company, at the end of the day they are not pretending they are not, as a private company they are not accountable. But, as you seem to miss, Paul Smith is working for East Riding Council – they are a private organisation – they ARE accountable to us, the taxpayer. I know i don’t want my tax money going to someone like Paul Smith who exploits women! His sites, which include “teens in braces.com” and adults dressed as babies were hardcore fetish stuff – not soft porn! The Mail isnt saying its right or wrong, the Mail is saying – this is what he does, as well as being a community man, you make up your mind on whether this is right or not. The Mail said the sites are legal, but if they are legal then why did Paul Smith remove them before anyone could check them out for themselves and make an informed decision on their content?
If it’s as simple and innocent a motive and mission as that, it seems incredible that they can have pitched and communicated it so poorly that almost unanimously the reaction seems to be that they are running dirty tricks to take down a competitor.
Perhaps qualifying their own position on the responsibility of publishing ads for sexual services etc, and even a clarification about what exactly they meant by the ‘photographing junior sporting fixtures’ innuendo might help….?
And of course reinstating the hundreds of comments they’ve removed.
I’m another ex-employee of the Mail and couldn’t believe the blatent mud slinging in this article, even if the reason for it was as honest and ‘upstanding’ as Tom suggests it was so badly written and so vindictive to leave 99% of the online readers of the story convinced it was a hatchet job.
I’m still in contact with several people at the Mail and most of them in private are also quite disturbed by this campaign and the sensational way its being written. The Mail certainly has no moral high ground with the amount of adverts it carries for x-rated services, many (most?) with connections to illegal brothels & prostitution but as long as they keep paying the bills they are quite happy to keep publishing the adverts, something that would have been totally unbelievable 20+ years ago when I joined the paper.
Time passes, the world changes but when does making a profit overtake common decency?
cheers Darren
@ Darren – it turns out Tom may also very probably be a girl called Kelly who posts loony stuff on this subject on Facebook, and therefore perhaps not 100% reliable in any matters factual. And is in fact probably not even Tom or Kelly of course.
See: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingston-Upon-Hull-United-Kingdom/Hull-daily-mail-sinks-to-all-time-low-with-p0rn-business-headline/340644624193?ref=ts